|
|
EXPLANATION OF CHANGES IN TRAVEL BEHIAVIOUR - Modal transfers
To change modal choice is the central
objective of the bicycle network plan. The
analyses of effects showed that the bicycle
share in the modal split actually
rose from 40 to 43 per cent.
In order to
determine to what extent this change is
due to modal transfers a panel of persons
making similar trips in 1982 and 1985
was surveyed. In this group modal transfers
occurred: 8 per cent of the 1985
bicycle trips were made by a different mode
in 1982. In the same period the
bicycle lost 2 per cent of its trips to
other modes. As was discussed in section
6.4 the bicycle mode attracts trips from all
other modes, but predominantly from
'walking' and 'car passenger'.
In order to explain the observed transfers
all choice elements to are checked on
potential changes due to the plan:
- on extension of the objective choice set
(new modes) is very unlikely;
- the improvement of the objective
accessibility of destinations by bicycle,
relative to other modes was an important
factor. Although distance and travel
time reductions were limited, comfort and
safety have been improved
substantially. This enhancement stems from
the amelioration of existing routes
(resurfacing, separate cycle paths) as well
as from the construction of new
routes.
- choice constraints on bicycle use have
diminished strongly between the before
and after situation. As was explained in
section 6.5 only a small part of this
reduction can be ascribed to the measures
taken. It implies however that the
group of unconstrained trips, i.e. trips
that could be made by bike, grew
considerably. If the bicycle mode is made
more attractive than the competing
modes, it will be effectively used for these
trips.
- it is plausible that the perception of the
bicycle travel alternatives and its
related attributes has been improved because
of the implementation of the plan.
Modal transfers are the chief cause of the
increase in the number of bicycle
trips per capita. As total trip frequency
per capita remained constant, the
transfers also result in a larger modal
share of the bicycle.
These modal
transfers to the bicycle are partly the
result of the growth of the class of
unconstrained trips, and partly due to the
increased attractiveness of the
bicycle mode. In the latter case travellers
with a choice will more often opt
for the bike.
It should be realized that the panel trips
for which modal transfers could be
analysed, relate only to half of the total
trips made in 1985. The other half
are 'new' trips, made e.g. by residents that
moved into the study area during
the study period. From the aggregate figures
it may be concluded that new
residents choose more often the bike than
residents who left the area in the
same period.
|